Archive for June 3rd, 2011

Education charity offers a course on living sustainably

 

Education charity offers a course on living sustainably

Posted 02 June 2011, by Staff, Isle of Man Today, iomtoday.co.im

A LOCAL educational charity is offering to help people live sustainably with a introductory weekend course on permaculture.

Island residents are being invited to join The Permaculture Association at the site of the Native Oak Group, near Jurby.

Permaculture is a design system that helps individuals, families and communities make the best of available local and global resources.

This ‘taster’ will provide an opportunity to actively learn about the principles and see examples of designs being implemented by groups and projects on the Island. Run by members of the local group who have been practising permaculture collectively over many years, this is a down to earth introduction that will look at the real challenges, pitfalls and delights of living more simply. These will include examples of renewable energy schemes, organic growing, compost loos, a reed bed system and much more. Inspiration from the wider global permaculture movement will also be provided.

Castletown resident, Ron Bevitt, a member of the local Permaculture Association, said: ‘Whenever we do anything of a self-reliant nature – growing food, fixing a broken appliance, maintaining our health, we are making a very powerful – and effective use of permaculture principles. Whenever we purchase from small, local businesses or contribute to local community and environmental issues, we are also applying these principles.’

Starting on the evening of Friday, July 8, running until the evening of Sunday, July 10, the course will cost £95 (including food).

Spaces are limited with 12 per course. See http://www.permacultureiom.org or e-mail permaculture@manx.net

 

http://www.iomtoday.co.im/news/isle-of-man-news/education_charity_offers_a_course_on_living_sustainably_1_3437026

“Worst Case Scenario” Realized as Three Fukushima Nuclear Reactors Melt Down

 

“Worst Case Scenario” Realized as Three Fukushima Nuclear Reactors Melt Down

 

Posted 30 May 2011, by Maurice Picow, Green Prophet, greenprophet.com

In what is being considered as a “worst case scenario” Japan power company authorities have now confirmed that three of the Fukushima nuclear reactors have actually melted down. The news follows onsite investigation by volunteer plant workers who were able to observe the damage from the March 9 magnitude earthquake and tsunami that flooded the reactors with sea water, which resulted in radiation levels in the seas near the plant of up to 1,250 times above normal levels. With this fact in mind, many people began to fear that a meltdown of the reactor fuel rods in even one of the damaged reactors will seriously affect the world environment  for  years to come.

Former Diiachi plant offices: too hot to handle

TEPCO confirmed a nuclear fuel meltdown in three of  the Fukushima Diiachi nuclear reactors, following earlier disclosure that only one reactor, the No. 1 reactor, had melted down. Spokespersons for Japan’s Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) finally admitted that fuel rods in at least three reactors “partially melted down” at the damaged Fukushima Diiachi nuclear power plant. This latest news quickly reached media sources including those in nearby Russia, where memories of the 1986 Ukraine  Chernobyl nuclear plant accident in what was then part of the former Soviet Union, is still very fresh on many people’s minds.

Suspicions concerning the seriousness of the reactor damage became more paramount when reports came in that at least two of the reactor fuel rods containment vessels were “riddled with holes”. Some of these holes, which became larger in the crucial 48 – 60 hour period following the earthquake, were as large as 7 to 10 centimeters ( 2.8- 3.9 inches) TEPCO representatives said in a prepared document that contains no less than 225 pages.

The Russian Ria Novosti news site reports that while the No. 2 and 3 reactors suffered partial meltdowns, reactor No. 1 suffered a “near total meltdown” resulting in “serious radiation leaks”.

The crisis surrounding this worst nuclear plant disaster since Chernobyl has resulted in Japanese citizens taking to the streets in protest against their government’s reliance on nuclear energy to create electricity.

While it is obvious that Japanese governmental authorities will not be able to replace nuclear energy with other fuel sources in the short run, this crisis may result in Japan weaning itself from its dependence on the same nuclear energy to provide power as that which devastated the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki at the end of WWII.

What’s happening in Japan should be a lesson to other countries as well, including those in the Middle East, that the use of nuclear energy is not really the “clean and green” fuel source that proponents of nuclear energy say it is.

::CNN

 

“Worst Case Scenario” Realized as Three Fukushima Nuclear Reactors Melt Down

And about time for rights to nature?

And about time for rights to nature?

Posted 02 June 2011, by Begonia Filgueira, UK Human Rights Blog, ukhumanrightsblog.com

It took until 1998 for the UK Parliament to incorporate human rights directly into the domestic legal system. In light of the dangers posed by climate change, is it time to go one step further and grant rights to the Earth herself?

Bolivia has done just that – the Mother Earth Rights Law (Ley 071(21 December 2010)) has now come into force.  Congratulations to everyone involved in drafting and promoting this law.  With Evo Morales’ Party (the Movement Towards Socialism) having a majority in Congress and the Senate, this law passed without much opposition.  It is a wonderful legal milestone, which I have been advocating for a number of years as the only way to balance the rights that humans have with the protection of the Planet and ultimately the human race.

I will explore the actual text of the law and its practical implications for a country that has both the cultural heritage to support this law and a number of environmental issues arising from its profitable mining industry which can put in peril the very cycles of Mother Earth it wishes to protect.  The implications of this law are however not only limited to Bolivia as there is a proposal for a UN Declaration of Mother Earth Rights kicking around the UN, which I hope will be further discussed at Rio 2012.

The Law itself

The First Article of this law sets out its objective:

“To recognise the rights of [Mother] Earth, and the obligations and duties of a Pluri-National State and of society to guarantee these rights”

The law then goes onto introduce a number of principles which are to govern both its interpretation and implementation, namely:

  • Harmony –  human activities must be guided by the dynamic cycles and inherent proceeds of the Earth;
  • The good of the collective – the rights of society as a whole within the framework of Earth Rights will prevail over rights granted to individuals;
  • Guaranteeing the Earth’s regeneration – human acts must preserve the Earth’s capacity to regenerate itself acknowledging that  the Earth has a limited capacity to absorb harm before its function and structure are altered;
  • Respect and protection of the Earth’s Rights – the State, individuals and society have a duty to respect and protect the Earth’s Rights for the good of present and future generations;
  • Non commercialisation – life processes and those things that sustain them shall not be commercialised nor be part of a person’s private property;
  • Multiculturalism – in order to exercise the Rights of the Earth we must recognise the values, knowledge, lore, technology, science, ability of those cultures that wish to live in harmony with Mother Earth.

So in one text Bolivia has recognised the Rights of Nature, society and those of future generations.  Further this law enshrines principles which are to influence interpretation of the wider body of Bolivian law.  Will “La Paz” be so appropriately named as to kick start a more harmonious and peaceful relationship between humans and the planet?

Mother Earth defined

The Bolivian law granting rights to Mother Earth defines Mother Earth as:

“ .. the living and dynamic system formed by the indivisible community of all life systems and living things whom are interdependent, interrelated and which complement each other sharing a common destiny.   Mother Earth is considered sacred by worldwide communities and indigenous peoples.”

If we look at the international research study I co-authored in 2009 (“Wild Law: Is there any evidence of earth jurisprudence in existing law and practice?”) aimed at creating a base line for drafting laws in harmony with Earth Jurisprudential principles we find that the main characteristics of laws imbued by these principles should include:

  • being centered on Earth Governance;
  • promoting mutually enhancing relationships for the well being of all the Earth Community;
  • being guided by community ecological governance.

The Bolivian definition of Mother Earth is charged with Gaian and the above Earth Jurisprudential principles. The Earth is recognised as a “..living and dynamic system..” – something James Lovelock discovered some time ago and is now widely recognised by the international scientific community.

This definition reflects exactly what we had in mind when we theorised about how laws could best promote mutually enhancing relationships for the well being of all the Earth Community. It recognises the inter-connectedness between humans and non humans. It recognises that there is an Earth Community, not only a human community, “which shares a common destiny” and has reciprocal needs.

The “sacred” characteristic of Mother Earth reflects both the Earth Centered Governance and the community ecological governance elements of this definition. Sacred may be a word that does not sit comfortably with those in the west who could criticize it for its religious connotations. However, this is not the language used by any church but by the indigenous communities of Bolivia and around the world to express the higher importance of the Earth for our survival. In its Earth Centeredness the law uses the word sacred to express its respect for the intrinsic value of the Earth and all its members, to value the Earth for what it already is.

To name the Earth as sacred is to communicate the intimate relationship between humans and the rest of the natural world where human conduct is regulated so as not to cause irreparable damage to the environment and its ecosystems. By lauding the Earth as sacred it tells those interpreting laws that the harmonious survival of ecosystems is more important than the exploitation of the Earth for quick enrichment of the minority.  The Earth is elevated to the status of a goddess by the indigenous community in Bolivia – she is Pachamama, part of the local lore/cultural heritage (community governance) of the Bolivian people and the Andean communities.

Legal status of the Earth and collective rights

The Bolivian law will cause two fundamental changes to the legal status of the Earth. First of all it will grant the Earth legal personality. Secondly the Earth is characterised as being of “public interest”.

Giving the Earth legal personality means that it can, through its representatives, bring an action to defend its rights. Like a company or a ship currently can. This will put an end to much of the legal standing issues that NGOs come across when trying to stand in and defend nature from overexploitation or damage. I can very well see a scenario where claims for climate change are made against industries which are emitting within legal limits but where environmental damage is being caused. I can predict that the law granting rights to Mother Earth will drive environmental policy at the highest level.

To say that the Earth is of public interest is also a major shift. There are many EU and UK laws which allow the public interest to trump over environmental concerns; the public interest not being normally defined as the well-being of the Earth community or the Earth, but determined largely by economic standards. By including the Earth in the public interest, there is an automatic shift from the human centric perspective to a more Earth community based perspective.

By including humans as part of those that have Earth rights, the Bolivian text has cleverly not only given rights to nature but also granted humans the right to a clean environment. Further it confirms that the interests of the Earth are in line with those of humans, our inextricable link for survival impossible to deny.

And if there is a conflict between human (individual) and Earth/human (collective) rights, how is this meant to be resolved? The law says that the bar, the limit will always be the destruction of living systems. As a lawyer I will be extremely interested in how the courts interpret this. Does it mean the complete destruction of a species, or ecosystem; or the probably/possible/likely/risk of this occurring?

So what are the Earth rights to be granted by Law? The Bolivian Law mentions the following, although it allows for flexibility and inclusion of other future rights: the right to life; the right to non corruption of the diversity of life; the right to water necessary to maintain living systems; the right to clean air; the right not to have the balance of the Earth cycles altered; the right to restoration of harm caused directly or indirectly by humans; and the right to live free of contamination including from toxic substances and radioactivity.

The above don’t seem many, only 7 in number; but adopting these rights is of enormous consequence. They would remodel our society and how we live, including our economic systems, which are in fact not working very well. It would allow us to come up with a great new political and economic plan for the future.

More on this in my next Bolivian blog.

Begonia Filgueria is an environmental lawyer and consultant. This post was first published at www.eric-group.co.uk. The UK Human Rights Blog is very grateful for her permission to reproduce it here.


http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2011/06/02/and-about-time-for-rights-to-nature-by-begonia-filgueira/

Biomimicry Solutions

 

Biomimicry Solutions

Michael Pawlyn looks to biomimicry for its vast and untapped resource of solutions that are not only effective, but  resource-efficient and clean, rather than our current wasteful and polluting manner.

 

Posted 30 May 2011, by  Michael Pawlyn, Diplomat Magazine, diplomatmagazine.co.uk

Nature includes an immense catalogue of forms, systems and processes that are efficient, require few resources to create and don’t produce waste or pollution. This catalogue of solutions has benefited, effectively, from a 3.8-billion-year research and development period – given that level of investment, it makes sense to exploit it. The rapidly developing discipline of biomimicry seeks to do just that, finding inspiration in the startling solutions that natural organisms have evolved over many millennia.

An example is the spinneret glands on the abdomen of a spider, which produce silk tougher than any fibre humans have ever made. The closest we have come is aramid fibre, which can only be produced at extreme temperature and pressure and creates large amounts of toxic waste. The spider, meanwhile, manages to make a stronger fibre in ambient conditions using raw materials of dead flies and water.

Similarly, the Canadian jewel beetle can detect forest fires, even in their very early stages, from up to 80 kilometres away – roughly 10,000 times the range of a man-made fire detector. This living fire alarm doesn’t need to be powered, and nor do its receptors create pollution.

These examples give a sense of what nature can do. Biomimicry, then, involves emulating natural forms, systems and processes that are effective, resource-efficient and clean and operate in closed loops rather than in our current linear, wasteful and polluting manner. If future generations are to enjoy a reasonable quality of life, then we urgently need to redesign the way we live now; biomimicry offers a vast and largely untapped resource of solutions to help us do so.

The Eden Project, a botanical enclosure in Cornwall designed by Grimshaw Architects, is an example of gaining inspiration from natural forms to create a resource-efficient structure. I was lucky enough to be on the design team, and we studied a range of natural forms, including soap bubbles, Buckminsterfullerene molecules and pollen grains to help devise the hexagonal tiles of the covered biomes. Instead of glass to fit each hexagon, as glass is limiting in terms of unit size, we used ETFE, a high-strength polymer which we assembled in three layers, welded around the edges and then inflated to create ‘pillows’ capable of spanning large areas.

The tiles we created were roughly seven times the size of what would have been possible using glass and 99-per-cent lighter than double-glazing. As a result, we were able to use much less steel to hold up the biomes’ shells, allowing more sunshine to penetrate the structures and saving on heating costs during winter. And as the overall weight of the superstructure was less, we could also save on the foundations. (Incredibly, at the end of the project we calculated that the superstructures actually weigh less than the air inside them.)

Thus, the Eden Project biomes are vastly more resource-efficient, both in their construction and operation, than conventionally designed buildings. Other projects are looking at super-efficient roof structures based on giant Amazon water lilies, abalone shells and plant cells – in addition to efficiency gains, there is a world of beauty to explore by using nature as a design tool.

One can also look to natural systems for ways in which man-made systems and products can be rethought to yield much greater efficiencies. Typically, man-made systems and products exploit resources in linear ways, refining them by high energy intensive methods, using them inefficiently and ultimately disposing of them as waste. In ecosystems, by contrast, one organism’s waste becomes another’s nourishment. This is known as a closed-loop system, and it allows for significant increases in resource-efficiency to be achieved.

Take the ABLE Project (formerly the ‘Cardboard to Caviar’ scheme), for instance. Developed by the Green Business Network in Kirklees and Calderdale, it manages to transform a low-value material into a high-value product and generate money at each stage of the process. The project involves collecting cardboard waste from local shops and restaurants which is then shredded and sold as horse bedding; once soiled, the cardboard is collected and put in a worm composting system. Worms sustained on this diet are harvested and fed to Siberian sturgeon, and finally the caviar produced by the sturgeon is sold back to stores and restaurants. Thus a linear process, by which the cardboard would have ended up as landfill, is transformed into part of a closed loop system, at once conserving resources and earning revenue.

Now consider the potential of natural processes. The Namibian fog-basking beetle lives in a desert environment, and so in order to survive it literally taps the sea fog that occasionally descends by letting moisture condense on its back. This particular beetle has inspired a multitude of innovations in a number of fields of design, including architecture. For example, the Sahara Forest Project proposes to restore large areas of desert to agricultural use while producing large quantities of fresh water and clean energy. A major element of the proposal is the Seawater Greenhouse: an ingenious technology that creates a cool growing environment in hot parts of the world and distils pure water from seawater, essentially mimicking the hydrological cycle in miniature. Seawater is evaporated from cardboard grilles at the front of the greenhouse – thereby creating cool, humid conditions within the greenhouse – and then condensed as distilled water at the back. Furthermore, these greenhouses can produce quantities of fresh water surplus to the requirements of the plants inside. The second key component of the project is concentrated solar power (CSP), which involves concentrating the heat of the sun to create steam which can be used to drive conventional turbines, thus producing ‘zero-carbon’ electricity.

The Sahara Forest project is proposed as a large-scale element of infrastructure that would produce renewable electrical energy from CSP and food from seawater greenhouses. Surplus distilled water from the greenhouses would be used to grow drought-tolerant external crops such as Jatropha, a source of biodiesel fuel, while minerals from the seawater would be used to fertilise the desert soil. The salts from the evaporation of seawater can be turned into a number of useful products, including building blocks from calcium carbonate and sodium chloride and desiccant compounds for low-energy cooling systems. It should also be possible to extract valuable elements such as lithium – a key ingredient in high-performance batteries, among its many other applications – from seawater.

Nature generally makes materials with a minimum of resource input, at ambient pressure and close to ambient temperature, and moreover does so in a way that enhances the environment rather than pollutes it. Abalone shells (sea snails whose shells are a colourful source of mother of pearl) are a great example of a natural manufacturing process that produces a material twice as tough as high-tech ceramics and highly resistant to crack propagation. The shells are a composite made from tough discs of calcium carbonate glued together with a flexible polymer mortar. The combination of hard and elastic layers stops cracks from propagating and the shell behaves like a metal, deforming elastically under load. Research into abalone shells may well lead to stronger and lighter car bodies, plane fuselages and indeed anything else that needs to be lightweight but fracture-resistant.

To conclude, though we are faced with some enormous challenges in the world today, I believe that studying the way nature solves its problems will provide positive and exciting solutions to those of our own making. For every problem that we currently face – whether it be generating energy, finding clean water, disposing of waste or manufacturing benign materials – there will be precedents within nature that we can study. Using biomimicry, the opportunity exists for architects to learn from a vast resource of design solutions, many of which will have evolved in response to resource-constrained environments. If we could learn to make and do things the way nature does, then we could achieve huge, unprecedented savings in resource and energy use. Within nature, one can find examples of incredible efficiency that can point the way to more sustainable solutions; I have mentioned just a few in this article, but there are many more innovative ideas and technologies currently being developed. A great deal can be gained by treating nature as a mentor when addressing the challenges we face in the years to come.


http://diplomatmagazine.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=470:biomimicry-solutions-&catid=39:lifestyle&Itemid=101

Hardy sorghum variety lifts small growers’ earnings

 

Hardy sorghum variety lifts small growers’ earnings

 

Posted  27 May 2011, by Staff, Business Daily, businessdailyafrica.com

 

Gadam sorghum was introduced to semi-arid regions of eastern Kenya as a way for farmers to improve their food security and earn some income from marginal land. The hardy, high-yielding sorghum variety has not only thrived in harsh conditions, it has won a place in the hearts — and plates — of local farmers.

In 2010, East African Breweries Limited (EABL), the regional beverage giant, was seeking around 12,000 tonnes of sorghum to brew beer.
KASAL, the Kenya Arid and Semi-Arid Land programme of the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (Kari), introduced gadam sorghum in eastern Kenya in 2009 for commercial production.

“The programme is a public-private partnership with an aim to improve income and food security among smallholder farmers in arid and semi arid parts of Kenya,” said Dr David Miano, the programme’s national coordinator.

The idea was to introduce a viable crop for largely marginalised land in Kenya’s arid zones, giving farmers there an additional crop that can sustain their livelihoods.

Eastern Kenya is characterised by drought, sometimes going without rain for two to three years at a stretch. After careful selection from several existing sorghum varieties, scientists say that gadam has been found to be the best placed variety able to survive and yield well in such tough climatic conditions.

“Apart from being ideal for beer brewing, it is as nutritious as any other variety of sorghum,” said David Karanja, a research scientist at Kari and the principal investigator for the Gadam Sorghum Production and Marketing Project.

Sorghum is not a new crop in this part of the country. Farmers here have always grown red sorghum varieties, but in small quantities as few people cared to eat it, and there was no market for it.

Despite persistent drought in this semi-arid part of the country, farmers have for years opted to grow maize, which is highly vulnerable to the conditions.

Gadam is a sorghum variety from Southern Sudan. It is early-maturing, high yielding, and is highly adapted to stressful drought prone areas. Kari is in the process of crossbreeding it with other varieties — hopefully to come up with a more superior variety.

“When the government introduced this sorghum variety for the first time in 2009, I was reluctant to take it on despite the promise of a ready market,” said Teresia Munyau, the chairlady of the Tears of Women Farmers Self Help Group and one of 3,200 farmers who took part in the project.

She committed two hectares to sorghum—a quarter of the land owned by her family in the village of Mwaani, in Makueni District. She harvested 12 90-kilogramme bags of grain. Through the self-help group, she sold eight bags to Smart Logistics, the firm contracted by the breweries company to purchase sorghum on its behalf at Sh1,530 per bag (17 dollars), and kept four for domestic use.

She plans to plant sorghum on four and a half hectares next planting season.

“Seventeen shillings per kilo — paid by the breweries company — is far higher than the Sh10 or even less paid for the same quantity of maize, during the harvesting period,” said Veronica Mutindi, a farmer from Kitwasi village. “It’s a premium price, given that before we got access to the commercial market, we used to sell a kilo of red sorghum at five shillings a kilo to local consumers.”
Makueni district farmers were happy with the yield, but researchers say that an outbreak of quelea birds was a major setback. “In some areas, the birds consumed more than a half anticipated yield while still in farms. This means that another season without such an outbreak will guarantee much higher yields,” said Karanja.

The initial plan, supported by EABL and KASAL, was for clusters of farmers to combine their harvests for sale to Smart Logistics which would further consolidate the crop and deliver it to the brewers in bulk.However, only 875 of the more than 3,000 farmers who took part in the pilot project, agreed to sell even part of their harvest to East African Breweries – originally expected to purchase the entire crop.

Like many other farmers, Munyau says it does not make sense to sell her grain when the countryside is expecting drought in the next few months. “I will not go begging for food and alms from humanitarian organisations for my children to eat,” the mother of four told IPS.

“That is why I will make sure that I have at least three bags of sorghum in my house at any time.”

“It was due to the plentiful harvests that we started exploring new methods of cooking sorghum, a move that has made the crop popular in just a year,” said Munyau.

Locals have taken to grinding it into flour to make ugali (the flour is mixed with boiling water) or porridge. They also mix the grain with rice, pigeon peas, or beans and other legumes to make delicious meals.

The KASAL programme, which is funded by the European Union and the Kenyan government, has now been extended to 3,800 more farmers in other parts of the country, including the Coastal, Rift Valley and Western regions. “We are up-scaling because so far we have not been able to meet the commercial market demand,” said Karanja.

Last year, EABL was seeking 12,000 tonnes of sorghum; farmers in the project delivered close to 1,000 tonnes. This year, the company wants even more.

“The breweries company has requested us to supply them with 24 million kilogrammes of sorghum. That is why we must introduce as many farmers as possible to sustain this growing commercial market demand,” said the researcher.

http://www.businessdailyafrica.com/-/539546/1169916/-/item/1/-/10oydrj/-/index.html