BP Disaster a Year Later, Healthcare Crisis Worsens

 

BP Disaster a Year Later, Healthcare Crisis Worsens

 

Posted 28 July 2011, by Lily Hough, Inter Press Service (IPS), ipsnews.net

WASHINGTON, Jul 28, 2011 (IPS) – When news of the disastrous BP oil well explosion reached the residents of Jean Lafitte, Louisiana last April, Mayor Tim Kerner did the only thing he could think of to stop the oil from destroying his community. He encouraged everyone in his town to join him on the water, working day and night throughout the disaster to clean-up the spill.

Now, one year after BP managed to cap the runaway well that fouled the Gulf of Mexico with an estimated five million barrels of oil, most of those people are ill.

“I’m afraid my neighbors will come to me and say, I wouldn’t have listened to you and kept my job if I knew it would kill me,” Kerner said.

Kerner’s story was one of many shared by Kerry Kennedy, president of the Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights, at a briefing Wednesday evening, the day after she led a delegation to the Gulf Coast to assess the scope of the emerging healthcare crisis in the wake of the BP drilling disaster.

“The residents are sick,” Kennedy told IPS. “They don’t know what the exact cause of their illness is, but because they never suffered this way before the spill and they were all out on their fishing boats throughout the clean-up, they suspect this has something to do with the toxins.”

According to Anne Rolfes, founding director of the Louisiana Bucket Brigade – an environmental justice group that partnered with Tulane University’s Disaster Resilience Leadership Academy to conduct an on- the-ground survey of residents living in impacted communities – nearly 75 percent of those who believe they were exposed to crude oil or dispersant reported experiencing symptoms consistent with chemical exposure.

“Coughing, respiratory irritation, and eye irritation were the most common,” Rolfes told IPS. “[Respondents] described that the symptoms came on suddenly and they left suddenly and that would be consistent with getting some sort of wave of chemical exposure, even when we took things like allergies into account.”

But Kennedy told IPS that local physicians are hesitant to link their patients’ symptoms to the oil.

“They don’t have the expertise to make a diagnosis in toxicology, they don’t know how to treat that diagnosis, and if they do attempt to treat it, they risk losing their medical licenses,” she said.

And in a predominately rural region where a majority of patients are self-employed and uninsured, the health care facilities are too far away and access to toxicology experts is near impossible,” Kennedy added.

“Even where that expertise is available, few can afford the expensive tests and medicines needed to treat toxic poisoning,” she continued.

At the briefing, Kennedy’s colleagues expressed hope that Congress would preserve funding for an expanding network of healthcare “centres of excellence”, including a low-cost model site soon to be established in honour of Robert Kennedy in Jean Lafitte.

“They don’t have the medical staff able to understand the effects of these toxins…so [patient’s complaints] sound very fanciful and are quite often written off,” said Steven Bradberry, executive director of the New Orleans-based Alliance Institute, which hosted the delegation.

“This is what we’re going for with these centers of excellence, where we can have people who are familiar with the various toxins and the effects of toxins…so that patients can have somewhere in the region where they can get information on [the symptoms] they are observing,” Bradberry said.

Their appeal has critical timing, as the explosive budget debate currently rocking Capitol Hill has been rife with calls to slash funds for programmes like Medicare, that are crucial to the livelihoods of low-income oil spill victims with new health concerns.

“We think it’s a serious crisis and the federal government needs to grab hold of this in a more aggressive way and provide the wherewithal to make sure that the hundreds of thousands of people who were impacted by the spill have their health care protected,” Phil Johnston, a member of the RFK Center’s board, emphasised.

Little mention was made of BP and its partners who, already facing possible legal ramifications for the disaster, pledged a 20-billion- dollar compensation fund to protect those impacted by the spill.

Earlier this month, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder informed Ken Feinberg, the man appointed to administer BP-related claims after his highly esteemed work with the September 11 Compensation Fund, that the Justice Department would initiate an independent audit based on complaints about the transparency of Feinberg’s claims process.

A brief filed Monday called the process an “abject failure,” and cited that the fund has so far paid only 16 percent of interim claims filed.

A recent study carried out by Advocates for Environmental Rights (AEHR) reported a discrepancy in the way Feinberg administered claims from previous disaster funds that were paid out with tax payer dollars – like 9/11 – with claims for the BP Oil Spill Compensation Fund, whose payments are siphoned from BP’s own piggy bank.

“We found that in past disasters, the folks who were filing claims did not have to show proof of causation. All they had to do was say they were ill, they were at this place or in this location, and so it was. Their claims were taken care of,” Michele Roberts, campaign and policy coordinator for AEHR, told IPS.

However, in the case of the BP Oil Spill Compensation Fund, Gulf residents have learned that their claims are denied if they cannot provide proof that BP and its dispersant are the exact cause of their illness, Roberts said, calling the inconsistency “a direct human rights violation.”

Rolfes is equally unimpressed with BP’s compensation efforts.

“You look around, you don’t see health clinics, all you see are BP- sponsored ads around town and in newspapers that say everything is fine,” Rolfes told IPS. “It’s not fine. Until I see health centres being built in every parish where there was an impact, I haven’t seen an adequate response.”

“What we need is healthcare now and that should be funded by BP,” Rolfes added. “It’s not right for the tax payer to pick up the tab for BP’s oil disaster.”

 

Long-Term Impact Needs Long-Term FundingEdward Trapido, associate dean for research and professor of epidemiology at Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, told IPS that the short term health impact observed in the year following the BP oil disaster could be minimal compared the the longer term effects on the population.

“Nobody has ever looked long term at the health of the population following a major oil spill,” Trapido said.

“We know that there were carcinogens in the oil. We know that there is entry into some levels of the food chain. But we don’t know what the hazards are of ingesting food that potentially could have evidence of contamination and these things are not answers we can get today and they are going to be the kinds of answers that will take multiple years of funding.”

Trapido is currently leading an LSU study on the physical and mental health of 6,000 women and 2,000 children, neighbors and families of the most heavily oil-and-dispersant exposed male cleanup workers, which has received initial funding by the National Institute of Health (NIH).

But five and 10-year studies like this have no guarantee they’ll be sufficiently funded and carried to completion. Because neither the federal nor state government structure is set up to have the legal authority to commit long term funds, Trapido called on the corporations responsible for the disaster to shoulder the long-term commitment necessary for determining the real health impact of the spill.

“It’s hard to imagine any other possibility,” Trapido told IPS. “I would be inclined to think that BP in this case has a moral obligation to support long term studies of human health related to oil spill exposure, and they should want to know, from the point of view of their own workers, what the long term effects are because they can do a better job of mitigating the impact of future oil spills on their own workforce.”

Trapido of called BP’s initial commitment of 500 million dollars towards research “a good down payment.

“But I would like to see a 20 year-long commitment,” Trapido said.

 

Related IPS Articles
 OP-ED: A Developing Health Crisis Across the Gulf Coast
 U.S.: BP Handling of Claims Slammed by Gulf Residents
 U.S.: Sick Gulf Residents Beg Officials for Help

 

http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=56675

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: