The Root of the Problem

 

The Root of the Problem

New research suggests that the flow of carbon through plants to underground ecosystems may be crucial to how the environment responds to climate change.

 

Posted 01 August 2011, by Richard D. Bardgett, The Scientist, the-scientist.com

Corbis, MICHAEL POLE

Human beings have inexorably altered the world’s ecosystems. We’ve plowed and seeded more than 40 percent of the Earth’s land surfaces, introduced alien species into new territories, poured carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, disrupted natural climate cycles, and polluted aquatic ecosystems with excessive nitrogen and other contaminants.

These far-reaching changes have spurred scores of researchers to examine the impacts of human activities on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, and to devise management strategies that might lessen the damage. Scientists have scoured ecosystems from the ocean’s depths to the highest mountain peaks searching for signals of global change. But only recently has this attention extended under the Earth’s surface to the soil, and the linkages between plants and belowground microbial and animal communities. This realm of research is of paramount importance because the impact of human-induced disturbances on the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems is often indirect: they tend to operate via changes aboveground that cascade belowground to the hugely complex and diverse, soil-bound biological community, driving biogeochemical processes and feeding back to the whole Earth-system.

And these studies may be overturning a commonly held view of how plants help mitigate the impacts of global warming. Indeed, it is widely thought that vegetation, especially trees, will respond to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations by growing more vigorously, and thus help to moderate climate change by locking up more carbon in their leaves, branches, and trunks. But research into the intricate dynamics occurring just below the soil surface, where carbon, nitrogen, and other elements flow through plant roots into the soil and react with the microbial and animal communities living there—including bacteria, fungi and a host of fauna—is complicating this simplistic view. In fact, some work suggests that as plant growth increases because of elevated CO2, more carbon not only flows into the plants themselves, but also exits their roots to impact the growth and activity of soil microbes. This causes a net increase in CO2 and other greenhouse gases escaping from the soil and entering the atmosphere, thus adding to anthropogenic levels.

These insights indicate that a combined plant-microbial-soil approach can lead to a more holistic understanding of the consequences of global change—including climate change—for the health and functioning of both terrestrial ecosystems and the whole Earth-system. Most importantly, the role that plant-microbial-soil interactions, and specifically carbon transfer from roots to soil, play in governing climate change and its impact on ecosystem carbon cycling is coming to light.

Getting Down and Dirty

Soils are the Earth’s third largest carbon storage depot after oceans and fossil fuels and together with vegetation contain about 2.7 times more carbon than the atmosphere. As a result, there is much concern that climate change will enhance the decomposition of this soil-bound carbon, potentially shifting soils from being sinks to sources of atmospheric CO2, thereby accelerating climate change: the so called carbon-cycle feedback. There is also a vigorous debate about the feasibility of slowing climate change by increasing the capacity of soils to sequester carbon from the atmosphere. Recent research is revealing that both the loss and gain of carbon in soil depend heavily on the pattern of interaction between plants, microbes, and the soil itself.

From the Ground Up -- By Richard D. Bardgett | August 1, 2011 As the planet warms plant growth will likely increase—locking up some of that extra carbon dioxide by converting it into vegetative biomass—but that’s not the whole story. In addition to direct effects of rising temperatures and altered rainfall, more carbon will also flow through trees down to and out of their roots, altering the activities of complex soil communities. A robust understanding of the dynamics of soil microbial and animal communities has only recently emerged, and some studies posit that soil communities may release more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, creating a positive feedback loop that worsens warming. Read the full story.

Climate change impacts soil carbon in a variety of ways, both direct and indirect.1 Even a subtle uptick in global air temperatures (of approximately 1°C) can directly stimulate microbial activity, causing an increase in ecosystem respiration rates in the subarctic peatlands which cover vast tracts of northern hemisphere and harbor a large portion of the organic carbon found in the world’s soil.2 Researchers monitoring an Alaskan tundra landscape also showed that permafrost thaw occurring over a span of decades has led to significant losses of soil carbon through soil respiration, despite increased plant growth and consequent ecosystem carbon input to soil, in the form of leaf litter and other plant sources.3 Given that tundra soils are among the world’s largest carbon stores, these studies indicate a potentially large and long-lasting positive feedback of carbon to the global climate system.

There remains much uncertainty, however, about how soil organisms directly respond to warming. For instance, it is unclear whether short-term increases in microbial activity and carbon cycling in response to warming will be sustained when fast-cycling soil carbon pools, such as carbohydrates and amino acids, become depleted and soil communities become acclimated to living in a warmer world.4

While more work remains to be done to fully elucidate the direct effects of climate change on soil microbes and carbon cycling, understanding strong indirect effects—for example, responses mediated via plants—is perhaps even more important. Two types of mechanisms drive these processes: first, rising atmospheric CO2 indirectly impacts soil microbes by way of increased plant photosynthesis and transfer of photosynthetic carbon to soil as root exudates; and, second, long-term, climate change-induced alterations in the composition and diversity of vegetation alter the amount and quality of organic matter entering soil, affecting the activity and structure of belowground communities.

It is becoming clear that both of these indirect mechanisms—short-term, individual plant-level and long-term, community-level inputs—have significant consequences for the carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems under conditions of climate change. With regard to short-term effects, University of Illinois graduate student John Drake and colleagues constructed a belowground carbon budget based on 12 years of measurements from the Duke Forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment in North Carolina, and showed that elevated CO2 concentrations caused a carbon cascade through the root-microbial-soil system in a low-fertility pine forest, altering the carbon budget of this ecosystem. Specifically, the researchers found that elevated atmospheric CO2 increased the flux of carbon to roots, which in turn stimulated microbial activity and the breakdown of organic matter in the soil. Because this process also stimulated the release and turnover of nitrogen and its uptake by the trees, it set in motion a positive feedback loop that sustained enhanced rates of tree growth, which locked up even more carbon in tree biomass, but not in soil.5

In a related study at Duke Forest, Indiana University’s Richard Phillips and collaborators, investigated the mechanisms behind this carbon cascade: over a period of 3 years, elevated CO2 concentrations in the air increased the rate at which tree roots exuded carbon by 55 percent, leading to a 50 percent annual increase in soluble organic inputs to soil.6 Upping the amount of carbon oozing from plant roots drove belowground microbes to release more extracellular enzymes involved in breakdown of organic nitrogen and accelerated the turnover rate of organic nitrogen in the soil. In sum, these findings point to the importance of such indirect, plant-driven mechanisms for understanding how climate change impacts the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems.

Scientists have scoured ecosystems from the ocean’s depths to the highest mountain peaks searching for signals of global change. But only recently has this attention extended under the Earth’s surface to the soil.

Despite these reports, there is still uncertainly about how soil microbes respond to more carbon being pumped into soil in a high CO2 world. For example, while the above studies show that upping the amount of carbon entering the soil stimulated soil microbes and nitrogen cycling, other studies show a different pattern. That is, enhanced root exudation under elevated CO2 can stimulate the locking up of nitrogen by microbes—termed nitrogen immobilization—which in turn limits nitrogen availability to plants, plant growth, and, ultimately, carbon transfer to soil. The reason for this discrepancy is unclear, but it is most likely due to the quality of the exudates and of other plant-derived organic matter, such as plant litter, entering soil. When the material is rich in nitrogen and hence has a low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, microbes will use the carbon for growth and liberate the excess nitrogen that they don’t need into the soil, thereby increasing nitrogen availability to plants. Conversely, when those substrates are low in nitrogen and have a high carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, the microbes become nitrogen starved and soak up any nitrogen that is available, therefore reducing its availability to plants. This often occurs because elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentrations in plant tissues, unless there is a continuing supply of nitrogen to the plants, for example through fertilizers.

More carbon coming from roots can also result in the mineralization of both recent and old soil organic carbon, making it metabolically available and leading to net carbon loss from soil through respiration.7 This mineralization can also increase the growth of mycorrhizal fungi, which can alter the release of carbon to the soil microbial community and enhance the stabilization of organic carbon by causing soil particles to aggregate.8 These studies show that forests respond to elevated CO2 in complex ways that tightly link plant-microbial-soil feedbacks fueled by inputs of root-derived carbon to soil. Moreover, they bolster the growing view that the transfer of recently fixed carbon from roots to the belowground subsystem serves as a major driver of soil food webs, and this has significant consequences for the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems adapting to climate change.

Evidence is also emerging that climate change can cause both local and regional shifts in the composition of vegetation by altering precipitation patterns and temperature regimes and by further elevating atmospheric CO2 concentrations. It’s becoming clear that such long-term shifts in composition of the plant community can affect the transfer of recent photosynthetic carbon belowground and thus affect ecosystem carbon dynamics. For example, Sue Ward and colleagues at the Lancaster Environment Centre, UK, used in situ stable carbon-isotope labeling approaches to show that removing key plant species from a dwarf-shrub heath community strongly affected belowground transfer and metabolism of recently added photosynthetic carbon.9 In particular, the removal of dwarf shrubs greatly increased community-level photosynthesis rates, the transfer of this recently assimilated carbon to soil, and its use by soil microbes, thereby speeding up rates of carbon cycling. There is growing evidence from a variety of ecosystems that plant species and functional groups—different species, such as legumes, grasses, and herbs, with similar physiological characteristics—differentially influence the uptake and transfer of carbon to soil via their exudates, suggesting that global warming-induced changes in plant community structure have the potential to alter patterns of carbon exchange. In general, however, much remains unknown about how changing the composition of plant communities can affect carbon cycling, and an important challenge will be to better understand the role of plant-soil feedbacks in modifying ecosystem carbon dynamics, especially given the extent to which climate-mediated changes in vegetation are already occurring worldwide.

Digging Deep

In all the work being done to illuminate and quantify the importance of belowground dynamics in driving the carbon cycle, the central message is similar: to better understand ecosystem functioning and its response to global change, we must consider feedbacks among plants, microbes, and soil processes. It’s clear that root carbon transfer and resulting carbon cascades through the plant-microbial-soil system play a primary role in driving carbon-cycle feedbacks and in regulating ecosystem responses to climate change.

Recent studies highlight the potential application of such understanding to land management challenges, such as enhancing soil carbon sequestration in grassland and degraded soils, which also hold potential benefits for food production and biodiversity conservation. Further study is also required to realize the potential for targeted crop-improvement strategies based on root traits that favor carbon sequestration in soil while also efficiently producing food. A new age of research and funding is needed to meet these scientific challenges and to integrate such understanding into future land-management and climate change mitigation strategies.

Soils as Sinks

A possible way to lessen the impacts of climate change is to engineer landscapes to increase the amount of carbon sequestered in soil. Mounting evidence suggests that managing grasslands may be a way to enhance soil carbon stocks, while reaping additional benefits for biodiversity conservation. For example, in model grassland systems it was recently shown that increasing plant diversity enhances CO2 assimilation by surrounding plants and belowground carbon allocation to roots and mycorrhizal fungi, which is a key mechanism driving carbon sequestration in soil.10,11 These effects, however, were due to the presence of legumes in high-diversity mixtures, rather than to diversity per se. Consistent with this, the introduction of legumes into grasslands under diversity restoration in northern England enhanced soil carbon sequestration, most likely because of increased input of carbon and nitrogen to soil and suppression of extracellular enzyme activities involved in the breakdown of organic matter.12

These findings point to the potential for using diverse grasslands with healthy plant-microbial-soil interactions to act as crucial buffers of climate change. Further research is needed to exploit this approach, especially since restoration of high-diversity grassland on degraded and formerly arable land is a key policy objective for sustainable agriculture in many parts of the world.

The mechanisms involved in plant manipulation of the carbon sequestered in soil involve myriad biotic interactions between plants, their symbionts (i.e., mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacteria), and decomposers whose activities determine the rate of decomposition of organic matter and hence of carbon loss from soil. In 2008, Lancaster University’s Gerlinde De Deyn and I, along with Hans Cornelissen of the Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, proposed a simplified plant-trait-based framework for understanding linkages between plant communities, the microbial community, and soil carbon sequestration.13 This framework is consistent with the growing recognition that plant functional traits, such as leaf-litter nitrogen content and relative growth rate, act as major drivers of belowground nutrient and carbon cycling and can favor particular groups of soil organisms that play key roles in these processes. A recent study of grassland plant species showed that, in particular, root traits, such as biomass and nitrogen content, were strongly correlated with several soil properties, especially the biomass and composition of the surrounding microbial community and measures related to soil carbon cycling.14

The mineralization of soil organic carbon—and hence soil carbon loss—in grasslands also appears to increase with plant productivity and decrease with root nitrogen concentration. For example, Feike Dijkstra and colleagues at the University of Minnesota showed in a study of sixteen grassland plant species that increased root nitrogen concentration (e.g., in flowering plants that are not grasses and especially in legumes) slowed down the decomposition of recalcitrant soil organic matter, whereas increasing plant biomass enhanced rates of decomposition.15 But specific plant traits, such as differences in the quantity and chemical composition of root exudates, are also likely to affect the mineralization of soil carbon by altering microbial activity.15 These studies suggests that plant traits, and especially those of roots, represent tools for understanding the mechanisms behind plant-microbial-soil interactions and ecosystem functions, and for predicting how climate change-induced shifts in plant species composition will feed back to the Earth-system. Moreover, given the importance of root traits for soil microbial processes related to carbon cycling, understanding of root interactions offers potential for modification of plant communities and the root traits of crops. Perennial grain species, for example, could be bred to produce more and deeper roots, which may maximize soil carbon sequestration.16

Richard D. Bardgett is a Professor of Ecology at Lancaster University’s Lancaster Environment Centre, in the UK. His research is focused on understanding the role that linkages between plant and soil communities play in the delivery of ecosystem services, especially sequestration in soils and nutrient cycling.

References

  1. R.D. Bardgett et al., “Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon-cycle feedbacks,” ISME J, 2:805-14, 2008.
  2. E. Dorrepaal et al., “Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic,” Nature, 460:616-19, 2009.
  3. E.A.G. Schuur et al., “The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra,” Nature, 459:556-59, 2009.
  4. M.A. Bradford et al., “Thermal adaptation of soil microbial respiration to elevated temperature,” Ecol Lett, 11:1316-27, 2008.
  5. J. E. Drake et al., “Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2,” Ecol Lett, 14: 349-57, 2011.
  6. R.P. Philips et al., “Enhanced root exudation induces microbial feedbacks to N cycling in a pine forest under long-term CO2 fumigation,” Ecol Lett, 14:187-94, 2011.
  7. J. Heath et al., “Rising atmospheric CO2 reduces soil carbon sequestration of root-derived soil carbon,” Science, 309:1711-13, 2005.
  8. G.W.T Wilson et al., “Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: results from long-term field experiments,” Ecol Lett, 12:452-61, 2009.
  9. S.E. Ward et al., “Plant functional group identity influences short-term peatland ecosystem carbon flux: evidence from a plant removal experiment,” Funct Ecol, 23:454-62, 2009.
  10. G.B. De Deyn et al., “Vegetation composition promotes carbon and nitrogen storage in model grassland communities of contrasting soil fertility,” J Ecol, 97:864-75, 2009.
  11. G.B. De Deyn et al., “Plant species richness, identity and productivity differentially influence key groups of microbes in grassland soils of contrasting fertility,” Biol Lett, 7:75-78, 2011.
  12. G. B. De Deyn et al., “Additional carbon sequestration benefits of grassland diversity restoration,” J Appl Ecol, 48: 600-08, 2011.
  13. G.B. De Deyn et al., “Plant functional traits and soil carbon sequestration in contrasting biomes,” Ecol Lett, 11:516-31, 2008.
  14. K.A. Orwin et al., “Linkages between plant traits and soil properties related to the functioning of temperate grassland,” J Ecol, 98:1074-83, 2010.
  15. F.A. Dijkstra et al., “Soil processes affected by sixteen grassland species grown under different environmental conditions,” Soil Sci Soc Am J, 70:770–77, 2006.
  16. J.D. Glover et al., “Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains,” Science, 328:1638-39, 2010.

http://the-scientist.com/2011/08/01/the-root-of-the-problem/

Advertisements

2 responses to this post.

  1. Love what you’re doing!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: