Archive for July 23rd, 2011

‘Matriarch’ Leads Struggle to Recover Stolen Land

 

‘Matriarch’ Leads Struggle to Recover Stolen Land

 

Posted 15 July 2011, by Constanza Viera, Inter Press Service (IPS), ipsnews.net

 

María Chaverra, the 'matriarch' leading the struggle to recuperate the local black community's land in the Curbaradó valley. Credit: Constanza Vieira /IPS

CAMELIAS, Colombia, Jul 15, 2011 (IPS) – “God willing, we will make it” reads the sign on a rusty old all-terrain vehicle, ideal for the complicated drive to the remote Curbaradó river valley in the banana-producing region of Urabá in northwest Colombia.

This area is part of the jungle province of Chocó, one of the world’s most biodiverse places until it was drawn into the armed conflict between left-wing guerrillas and government forces – and, since the 1980s, far-right paramilitary militias – that has plagued Colombia for nearly half a century.

IPS travelled to this isolated region with documentary-makers from Justice for Colombia, a coalition founded in 2002 by the British trade union movement in response to murders of labour activists and the overall humanitarian crisis in Colombia.

The killings in Urabá began in 1995, and the major paramilitary offensive started in 1996. “This has all changed so much that it looks completely different now. Everything has been destroyed: the trees, the jungle, the rivers, the streams,” says María Chaverra, 69.

The slight, dark-skinned mother of eight and grandmother of 37 has lived here for over half a century, as a member of one of the afro-descendant communities who have practiced subsistence agriculture in the sparsely populated Chocó, Colombia’s poorest province, for generations.

Although by law the rural black communities collectively own their territories, many have been driven off their land, which is rich in natural resources and biodiversity, since the 1990s.

Throughout the Curbaradó river basin and the Jiguamiandó river valley to the south, Chaverra is known as the “Matriarch” in recognition of her leadership role.

African oil palm companies financed with capital of dubious origin came into the area and diverted rivers and dried up streams. After weeks of drought – inconceivable in the past in Chocó, one of the world’s rainiest regions – the water is finally pouring down now.

This is the Camelias humanitarian zone, a five-minute walk from the Curbaradó river. The zone, which is under the protection of Inter-American Court of Human Rights provisional measures, is home to some 30 internally displaced families who have braved the dangers to return to their land.

In the humanitarian zones, no armed actors are allowed within the premises, to protect the civilians from the surrounding armed conflict.

Some have dared to leave Camelias, to move back to their nearby farmland, which is not encompassed by the humanitarian zones. Meanwhile, new families arrive, seeking refuge from threats.

Camelias, a 3.5-hectare area, belongs to Chaverra. “My husband and I donated it to create the humanitarian zone, and to bring people together here, to struggle, defend and denounce. When everyone goes back to their nearby farms, there will be no more humanitarian zone,” she says.

“By denouncing what has happened here, at the national and international levels, with the support of the Colombian Inter-Church Justice and Peace Commission, we were able to get help to create this humanitarian zone. So we started moving closer to our territory, but most of the people haven’t made it back to their land yet,” she explains.

“We live in the middle of a conflict, but we have nothing to do with any of the armed groups – neither the paramilitaries, nor the army, nor the guerrillas, none of them,” she says.

Large signs announce that Camelias is “exclusive to a civilian population protected by Inter-American Court provisional measures”.

The area is marked off by barbed wire on all sides. On the nearby river bank is a military base. Across the river is Puerto Brisas, a village reportedly under the control of paramilitaries who are supposedly demobilised.

The paramilitaries moved into the area with the excuse that they were driving out the left-wing guerrillas, who took up arms in 1964. But their real aim turned out to be the land.

To force the local population out, the paramilitaries accused them of belonging to the rebel groups, burned down their houses and villages, and killed many. By 1997 the entire population in the two river basins had fled their homes, and most had left the area.

Between 3.6 and five million Colombians have been displaced since the mid-1980s. The number depends on the source of the estimate – the government or human rights organisations.

“We were displaced by the Colombian State itself, because the incursions were carried out by the paramilitaries in complicity with the army, Brigade 17,” which was based in a nearby municipality, says Chaverra, repeating what she had denounced to the Inter-American Court.

“It wasn’t guerrillas they drove out. I was a witness. I never saw a war like the one that took place here,” she says. “It was the peasants who suffered. The ones who didn’t die suffered calamities and were exposed to the elements. Many saw their children die,” and the adults died without any medical treatment or even a simple painkiller, she recalls.

“Many pregnant women gave birth along the trails. They would go into labour as they ran, and when they couldn’t run anymore, they would stop and the baby would drop out right there. That’s what our life was like in this war,” she says.

But Chaverra and her family stayed in the area, dodging death. “We were a group of seven families, and we would escape together. When we heard bullets, we would flee to another place. Once we lived in the mountains for six months: rain or shine, we had no protection, even if it was pouring like today,” she adds.

They sought shelter in the cave-like enclosures formed by the enormous roots of certain trees in the jungle. They often had to steal rice to eat.

When they returned, “there wasn’t a single piece of land that didn’t have African oil palms planted on it. And the chemicals (pesticides) had deteriorated the land,” she says.

The families in Camelias depend on farming. “We tried again. Despite the fear, we planted the plantains that you see over there,” and rice and corn, and started to raise a few chickens “to be able to eat,” Chaverra says.

With the harvest from one hectare of corn they buy sugar, salt, soap and cooking oil. But when they need something from Puerto Brisas, Chaverra sends someone else. “Many of us don’t cross to the other side. Me, I don’t even go to the edge of the river,” she says.

“We are all under threat, especially me because I was the legal representative of the two river basins for six years,” she adds.

The military base “watches out for the interests of the companies, we know that because we have seen it,” she says. And the paramilitaries? Chaverra holds her two index fingers next to each other, and says “they’re together.”

During a community assembly they all debate, gesture and draft statements. Chaverra, who speaks at the end, doesn’t beat around the bush: “What the ministers should have told us is that they are immediately going to evict the invaders from our land,” she says.

The ministers of agriculture, Juan Camilo Restrepo, and the interior, Germán Vargas, visited Camelias in March, to formally recognise the local community’s collective ownership of the two river basins.

The government did so in compliance with several Constitutional Court verdicts in favour of the traditional inhabitants of the area, issued after the community began its legal battle in 2000 with the help of the Inter-Church Commission, which also receives constant death threats.

The court rulings also ordered outsiders who occupied the land of displaced persons to move out. But the ministers didn’t mention that aspect, and the police have done little to nothing.

Conservative President Juan Manuel Santos promised that during his 2010-2014 term in office, his government will distribute two million hectares of land to peasant farmers, by returning land seized from them and issuing formal land titles, which many small farmers lack even when the property has been in their family for generations.

The goal for 2011 is 500,000 hectares, but the official figures indicate that of the 217,000 hectares distributed so far, only 14,000 involved the restoration of land to the original owners.

The people who have occupied the land around Camelias are not to be trusted. In June, one sexually assaulted a four-year-old girl and fled, after another did the same with a 10-year-old girl just a few weeks earlier.

In May, the Ministry of Agriculture reported to the public prosecutor’s office the attempted rape of two women in the area. An unarmed group of activists from the UK-based Peace Brigades International (PBI) had driven the attackers off.

In June, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights asked the Inter-American Court to expand the provisional measures to the areas surrounding the humanitarian zones.

In December, waves of squatters, poor but intimidating, began to flood into the Curbaradó basin. They warned that if they were bothered, “there are three possibilities: club, machete or lead,” Chaverra says.

“The business owners who drove us out are behind the invasion,” she adds.

“They want us to clash with them, to be able to say ‘it’s a fight among peasants’. We have avoided that,” she says. “We want them to be evicted legally from our territory, by peaceful means, by the authorities.”

A census is now being carried out, under the orders of the Constitutional Court, and elderly inhabitants like Chaverra can play a key role in identifying members of the traditional community, and determining which people are invaders who should be evicted.

More than 1,000 hectares in the area have been occupied and time is pressing. “The farms of five of our families have been invaded. We don’t have anywhere to plant even a clump of rice,” says Adriana Tuberquia.

“We had plantain crops and the invaders cut the plants down to plant corn. We’re desperately waiting for them to be evicted,” she says. (END)

 

 

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=56502

Conservation of an endangered species: the female scientist

 

Conservation of an endangered species: the female scientist

We need to reduce the impact of career breaks to encourage more women to pursue academic careers in science

Are female professors an endangered species in the UK?

 

Posted 22 July 2011, by Dr Nathalie Pettorelli and Dr Seirian Sumner, The Guardian (Guardian News and Media Limited), guardian.co.uk

 

Why is it that less than 10% of all professors in UK science are women? Almost half of GCSE and A-level students studying science are female, so lack of interest at school is not the explanation. Yet, as a woman in science you get used to attending conferences and committee meetings where having two X chromosomes makes you a rare commodity.

Admittedly, there are many positive side-effects to being a minority group and there are plenty of official pats on the back for being a women and being a scientist. There are perks for the female scientist who clings to her career long enough: we get asked to join committees as the “female representative” (note the singular here), or added to speaker-lists at the last minute, when the organisers realise they’ve only asked men to speak.

But the whole picture doesn’t sit well with the progressive, gender-equal 21st century we’re told we live in. Neither does it really address the issue, and although some lucky individuals get picked up as poster girls for science, progress towards a healthy representation of women is unacceptably slow. So we ask the questions: why do women leave science, and how can we rectify this?

Contrary to popular opinion, the challenge is not in engaging girls with science at school. The challenge is about making them stay in science after degree level. For example, in biology, an extremely popular subject among young women, 60% of undergraduates are female. This number drops by almost half by the time women reach their first permanent position – university lecturer. And there is no levelling off after that. Those women that survive to become professors make up less than 15% of the positions..

Understanding why women leave science is a puzzle to many scientists: why would they leave a job they are passionate about? The thing is, when you’re young, with few personal ties and responsibilities, you can wholeheartedly embrace your thirst for knowledge and your eagerness to advance that knowledge, and let it take you as and when it demands. The problems start when you hit your late-20s to mid-30s, when it begins to dawn that something in life is not quite matching up and that compromises have to be made.

Science is an increasingly competitive environment, with more people competing for diminishing pots of research money. Those that work the hardest, network the most effectively, and go where the best job opportunities are will be the ones that succeed. Yet in a society where parental care falls mostly to women, where salaries still favour men, where compromises in domestic life are more readily expected from women, and where childcare is costly and rarely easily accessible at the work place, maximizing your chances of academic success while aspiring to build a family can look quite incompatible for most women.

Of course, these challenges are not exclusive to scientists, but apply to any woman in a competitive work environment who needs to balance personal life with career aspirations and demands.

What can be done to help address the imbalance? Women’s place in science is clear: relative to men we tend to excel in communication skills, social skills, multi-tasking, creative thinking and empathy – traits that are key to boosting scientific progress. These attributes can play a vital role in taking science to the next level, especially as it becomes more and more collaborative, integrative and innovative. Science needs women to help this happen.

What can we do to help the world benefit from more women in science? We don’t need to worry too much about enthusing the most junior set as they are doing a good job for themselves, and in some cases outnumbering the men. Instead, we believe the key to increased representation of women in science lies firstly in ensuring that mechanisms are put in place for the career costs of parenthood to be more equally distributed between men and women.

We need to reduce the impact of career breaks on future professional advancements: for example by introducing a new section in all applications (grants, postdocs, lectureships) where scientists can fully document any career breaks they have had and the impact they perceive this has had on their research track record. We need to increase the provision and job opportunities for relocating families and partners. We should provide targeted support for women in their 30s who are typically in the transition between senior postdoc and an independent research position, and who often have gone beyond the stage of being eligible for the more junior fellowships.

Finally, we need visible female role models, willing to engage, share their experiences and push for implementation of measures like these to ensure women’s representation in science improves, and goes from strength to strength. Everyone knows the world needs science. Many acknowledge that science needs women. Let’s make it possible for science to get the women it needs.

Dr Nathalie Petorelli and Dr Seirian Sumner are research fellows at the Institute of Zoology, a division of the Zoological Society of London (ZSL) and a partner of the University of Cambridge. Both are co-organising the Soapbox Science event at London’s South Bank on Friday 22 July, in association with the L’Oréal-Unesco for Women in Science programme and the ZSL.

This content is brought to you by Guardian Professional. To get more articles like this direct to your inbox, sign up for free to become a member of the Higher Education Network.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/higher-education-network/blog/2011/jul/22/encouraging-women-science-academics

Women’s Environmental Network

 

 

Women’s Environmental Network

Posted 21 July 2011, by Staff, Working to Give, workingtogive.org

The Women’s Environmental Network (WEN) is a UK-based organization set up to “educate, empower, and inform” those to whom the environment is important.  One of its main activities in this realm is campaigning on environmental and health issues, but from a woman’s point of view.  Formed in 1988, the WEN seeks to connect women, health and the environment.

Environmental Issues

According to its website, the WEN has worked out that with today’s huge amount of consumption, three planets would be necessary to adequately sustain our needs.  Given that this is due only to increase, soon five planets would be needed as figures shown the population will exceed nine billion by 2040.

Women and the Environment

So the question that is to be asked, is why is this so much more of an issue for women than men?  Apparently, this is because women comprise 66 percent of those impacted by “climate-related disasters in developing economies.”

What’s also sad is that fewer and fewer individuals are connecting these days to “simple pleasures like communal outside spaces and growing their own food.” So there needs to be a change in the way in which we are living.

Women Green Pride

On the flip side of all of this, there is actually a lot being done in this realm, especially by women in the UK.  For example, there is a bunch of groups led by women who “every day, take conscious actions to consume less, to use resources more effectively, to raise awareness at grass roots levels about climate change and to engage women and men in community-based projects such as allotments and orchards.”  So there is much being done.  But there is obviously also, still much more that can be done too.

 

http://www.workingtogive.org/charity-info/environment

 

 

Trekking Trails Lead Nepal Women to Empowerment

Trekking Trails Lead Nepal Women to Empowerment

Posted 22 July 2011, by Sudeshna Sarkar, Inter Press Service (IPS), ipsnews.net

Mulkharka's women cleaning up the trekking trail that is an economic lifeline for the village. Credit: Arun Shrestha/IPS

KATHMANDU, Jul 22, 2011 (IPS) – Dawa Gyalmo Sherpa’s three sons went to look for blue-collar jobs in Malaysia, Jordan and Saudi Arabia, saying Mulkharka, their tiny village in Kathmandu valley, had no livelihood prospects.

However, when all three came back empty-handed, with complaints of being poorly paid, their mother, who runs a small tea house, became the breadwinner of the family.

Unlike her sons, 46-year-old Sherpa is illiterate but capably runs the ‘Riverside Khajaghar’ tea house. Once an unassuming eatery it began to get better custom after an old trekking trail running through the village was revived by a local non-government organisation (NGO).

“There are 200 houses in Mulkharka,” says Ashok Maharjan, secretary at Nepal Environment and Tourism Initiative Foundation (NETIF), an NGO founded in 2006 to develop and sustain the environment and rural tourism. “Around 60 percent of the population consists of women and it is mostly they who run the tea houses and trekkers’ lodges.”

Thousands of women like Dawa have been shouldering the double burden of looking after the family and earning for them as husbands and sons went abroad in search of jobs as a 10-year civil war exacerbated poverty and unemployment in Nepal.

With tourism the mainstay, the government launched in 2001 the Tourism for Rural Poverty Alleviation Programme aimed at developing sustainable rural tourism, focusing on the poor, women, environment and community.

Funded by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)in Nepal, the British government’s Department for International Development, and the Netherlands Development Organisation, the programme operates in six districts outside the Kathmandu valley, building infrastructure and providing training to run micro enterprises.

Now NGOs are also coming forward to promote tourism. Funded by the Finnish government and Suomen Latu, a Finnish NGO focused on recreational sports and outdoor activities, NETIF is promoting the Kathmandu Valley Cultural Trek, on a 72 km trail winding through six towns – Sundarijal, Chisapani, Nagarkot, Dhulikhel, Namobuddha and Panauti – as well as the Shivapuri National Park.

“An old trekking trail existed here, but it became disused for lack of maintenance,” says Prabin Paudel, coordinator of the heritage trail project. “We helped the community repair and green it by planting trees. Last month, in Chisapani alone 3,200 rhododendron saplings were planted.”

In Mulkharka, where cooking gas is yet to make its appearance, villagers use firewood for cooking. It caused widespread felling of trees, forced the women to spent several hours of their day scrounging the forest for wood, and also led to eye and respiratory diseases caused by the smoky, primitive clay stoves they used.

NETIF began by offering new improved cooking stoves that reduced wood consumption by almost 50 percent. These are manufactured by the Alternative Energy Promotion Centre run by the environment ministry under its energy sector assistance programme supported by the Danish International Development Agency.

“We then provided them training in briquette-making,” says NETIF president Arun Shrestha. “These are processed from either dung or banmara (mikania micrantha), a pernicious weed that overruns and destroys forests.”

This was rounded off with training in organic farming, so that the women can grow vegetables and crops like maize, basic hotel training and skills in making handicraft items.

“Before the heritage trail was developed, the area saw about 20,000 tourists a year,” says Paudel. “Now, it has reached around 80,000.”

More tourists means better business for the tea shops and lodges. Dawa Gyalmo is planning to upgrade Riverside Khajaghar to a lodge for trekkers to stay overnight.

Other women are following suit. The new demand for financing has given rise to six major women’s groups in Mulkharka with the members starting their own micro-finance cooperatives.

“Each woman contributes about Nepali Rs 100-200 (1-2.5 US dollars) and the accumulated fund is loaned out,” says Dawa Sherpa, secretary of the Sundarijal Environment and Tourism Development Society. “They decided to form their own cooperatives after they realised that loans taken from the outside carried far higher interest.”

Tourists bring business, but litter the trail with plastic bags, mineral water bottles and wrappers. Women’s groups now voluntarily scour the entire trail twice a year segregating biodegradable waste and burning it in incinerators gifted by NETIF. The rest is taken down to the municipality’s garbage collectors.

Other organisations have begun promoting similar trails. In hilly western Nepal, the Micro Enterprise Development Programme (MEDEP), a multi-lateral, donor-funded poverty reduction initiative, the ministry of industry and UNDP are supporting two trails and spent 138,120 dollars on infrstructure since last year.

MEDEP’s 7-9 day ecotourism trek through the districts of Parbat, Myagdi and Baglung includes a stay in a 20-bed lodge that is expected to bring in dollars.

The indigenous Magar community, which provides the bulk of the ‘Gurkhas’ serving in the British and Indian armies, dominate the region. With Magar men mostly out of the country, their women take all the key decisions at home.

“While we put up 60 percent of the money for the lodge, the community contributed 40 percent,” says MEDEP’s Laxmi Pun. “The revenue earned by the lodge will go back to the community,” she said.

(END)

http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=56586

Green is the New Red: An interview with Will Potter

Green is the New Red: An interview with Will Potter

 

Posted 22 July 2011, by Robert Jensen, MWC News (Media With Conscience), mecnews.net

 

For centuries, the arbitrary use of power by the state against dissidents has been a key threat to freedom. More recently, the concentrated wealth of corporations has emerged as a major impediment to democracy. When those two centers of power decide to come after people, not only do the individuals suffer, but freedom and democracy take a beating.

In his debut book, Green Is the New Red: An Insider’s Account of a Social Movement under Siege (http://www.greenisthenewred.com/blog/), independent journalist Will Potter (http://www.willpotter.com/) details one such assault on freedom and democracy, the targeting of environmental and animal-rights activists. In recent decades, corporations whose profits depend on degrading the ecosphere started to worry that those activists posed a real threat to their operations. Politicians and law-enforcement agencies responded with laws and tactics targeting not only the illegal actions of some of those groups but also the constitutionally protected speech and association of a wider range of groups. The fear-and-smear campaigns take their toll on the activists.

In a book that alternates between reporting and reflection, Potter not only details the strategy and tactics of corporations and the state, but also gives readers a feel for the human costs for the activists. In an interview, I asked Potter to explain the threat posed by these campaigns.  [Full disclosure: Potter was a student in two of my classes at the University of Texas at Austin. Since his graduation, I have followed his work and now think of him as a colleague rather than a former student.]

Robert Jensen: Let’s start with what you don’t mean by the title, Green is the New Red. You say in the book that you aren’t suggesting the environmental/animal-rights movements are directly analogous to the left/radical/socialist/communist movements that were targeted in the Red Scares of the 20th century in the United States. If the scope of those Red movements was wider and the repression faced much more severe, what is the title intended to communicate?

Will Potter: Although I make clear that what’s going on now is not the same or worse than the Red Scare (nor is it the same or worse than what Arab and Muslim people have experienced since September 11), these current events need to be understood in a historical context. Coordinated campaigns to target and repress dissident voices have taken place throughout U.S. history, and foremost among them is the Red Scare. For most Americans, of all political stripes, that term is synonymous with using fear to push a political agenda — it is a dark era of U.S. history where lives were ruined, and freedoms chilled, in the name of national security. Beyond those big-picture similarities, though, there are eerie parallels between the Red Scare and this Green Scare, in terms of the specific tactics used by corporations and politicians to instill fear and silence dissent.

RJ: Whatever the size or current influence of these radical environmental movements, you write that they are challenging core notions of what it means to be a human being. Based on your experience as an activist and your reporting, how do you assess these movements?

WP: These movements, like all social justice movements, have diverse components. Although it has become fashionable to “go green,” the true nature of the environmental and animal rights movements goes much deeper than promoting hybrid cars and energy-saving light bulbs. They are about more than promoting a quick-fix or advocating environmentalism through consumerism. These movements are challenging deeply held religious and cultural beliefs that the interests of human beings are always paramount, and that we have the right to use the earth and other species in whatever ways we see fit, costs be damned. These movements recognize that behaving as if human beings are the only species on the planet is destructive, but their critique is more than an appeal to self-interest. It is about critically examining our relationship with the natural world, and all other species on the planet, and questioning what it means to be a human being.

RJ: Do you think that is the reason those movements are being targeted, because people in power in government and corporations understand how fundamental that challenge is, and want to suppress it?

WP: Absolutely. In fact, that’s how the threat is often described by these individuals themselves in Congressional hearings, internal corporate documents, FBI memos, Homeland Security reports, and in the media. At first I dismissed much of this as political theater — exaggerating the threat in order to justify the crackdown. For instance, it was hard not to laugh when the CEO of Yum Foods (KFC’s parent company) testified before Congress that PETA represents the threat of a “vegetarian world.” He called them “corporate terrorists.” But this culture war rhetoric stops being funny when you see how it plays out in real life. PETA, along with other mainstream groups like the Humane Society of the United States, have been attacked as “terrorists” by corporations and politicians, and investigated by the FBI. The only way we can explain that groups like the Humane Society are being investigated as terrorists alongside the Animal Liberation Front is that all of it — the aboveground and the underground, the mainstream and the radical — represents a cultural threat.

RJ: Let’s go back to your reference to the specific tactics used, by both government and corporations, in this campaign. What are some of the most common tactics, and what is the strategy behind them?

WP: The comparison of today’s political climate to the Red Scare was particularly useful in identifying and classifying the tactics used in this campaign. The tactics, then and now, can be grouped into three main areas: legal, legislative, and a third I would call extra-legal, or scare-mongering. The courts have been used to push the limits of what constitutes “terrorism,” and to hit activists with disproportionate penalties and prison sentences. In this realm the word terrorist is used early, and used often, to skew public opinion against defendants before they ever set foot in a courtroom. At some point these legal tactics have limitations, though, and so corporations and politicians have lobbied for new laws that go even further. Federal laws like the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act, coupled with state-level legislation, are being used to single out activists based on their political beliefs. The intention with these legislative efforts is not only to enact new laws, but to use Congressional hearings and political theater to shift cultural perceptions of these movements. The final element is perhaps the most dangerous of them all. During the Red Scare, court cases and legislation sent people to prison, but scare-mongering tactics (PR campaigns, press conferences, ads, reckless use of language to demonize people) leveraged the weight of fear and incarcerated many more.

The strategy behind these tactics is fragmentation. In discussing this, I think it’s helpful to visualize social movements as having a “horizontal” and “vertical” component. The intention is to separate these movements horizontally, and create rifts between them and the broader left. Animal rights activists and environmentalists are therefore depicted as ideological extremists who, if they have their way, will stop you from eating meat and driving cars and having pets. There are of course already tensions between these movements and the more traditional left, but campaigns by corporations and politicians intend to exacerbate them. If these movements are not seen as part of a broader social justice struggle, it is easier for other leftist and progressive groups to turn their backs on their repression.

Similarly, there is a campaign to fragment these movements vertically. Aboveground lawful groups are told that they must condemn underground groups, and if they do not they will also be treated as terrorists. This two-prong strategy — breaking these movements away from other social movements, and breaking the aboveground away from the underground — isolates those who are being targeted and intensifies the repression.

RJ:  Whatever one thinks of the specific analyses or tactics of groups such as the Earth Liberation Front, the accelerating pace of ecological collapse suggests their call to consciousness about the larger living world is more important than ever. After your investigation into the Green Scare, what is your assessment of the likelihood the culture will listen?

WP: As the scale of the ecological crisis we are facing becomes more apparent, and as the backlash against social movements that are challenging our self-destructive culture intensifies, it is difficult to not feel dark, to feel helpless. I certainly feel that way quite often — not just because of the content of my own work, but from the near-blackout in the mainstream press. Unfortunately, I do not see any of this changing anytime soon. As the ecological crisis accelerates, the accompanying crackdown by corporations and people in power will intensify as well. The people who have the most to lose will cling desperately to that culture as it is threatened, and this includes not just CEOs but much of the overwhelmingly privileged United States and so-called First World.

After all of that, this will probably sound quite odd, but in the face of this I would argue that there are reasons to be inspired. Through my work, and in particular through book and media tours, I have been fortunate to meet people all over the country from diverse backgrounds. What has been striking to me is that, even if people are unfamiliar with the Green Scare or the targeting of political activists, they are rarely surprised. People may not know the specifics, but they know that corporations have more power than people. They know the scope of ecological destruction is increasing. They know we have no choice but to change but that people in power will not change willingly. I’m not convinced that the question at hand is whether or not the culture will listen, because I think that so many people already feel this. I think the question is: Will we find the courage to be heard?

 

http://mwcnews.net/focus/analysis/12283-will-potter.html

 

 

The Animal Liberation Front Supporters Group Newsletter #17

 

The Animal Liberation Front Supporters Group Newsletter #17

Posted 17 July 2011, by Staff, Conflict Gypsy, conflictgypsy.com

 

The Animal Liberation Front Supporters Group Newsletter #17 (1985, London, England.)

It is not usually our habit to put up a single issue of a serialized publication as we prefer to post an entire year, or run of magazines, in a single post. However, we must make an exception for the ALF SG Newsletter #17, which contains a fantastic investigation of the Band of Mercy and comes complete with an image of their first press statement from November of 1973. The significance of that image, the very first communique from an underground group fighting on behalf of other species, can not be understated.

When one considers how entrenched animal exploitation is in our culture, the idea that a tiny band of revolutionaries could push back against that social tide by burning down an animal laboratory under construction is a watershed moment. The arson attacks and raids carried out by the Band of Mercy were pivotal in the creation of the animal rights movement.

This issue has much more in store for readers. The second communique from the Animal Rights Militia is presented in it’s entirety, and although it provides a myopic examination of the role of liberatory violence it is none the less a fascinating read for lovers of animal rights history. The story of the famous Ecclesfield Beagle raid is presented by one of it’s participants, Roger Yates has a long letter explaining his feelings on the uselessness of national groups, and funny pseudonyms abound! If you thought Earth First!ers had funny names, wait till you get a load of Captain Kirk, Martial Rose, and Black Vixen!

If you look carefully you may notice that this issue is missing some pages. We do not know if this is because they were removed by their original owner, or if this is one of the issues of the SG rumored to have been “edited” by the British government as it left post offices on it’s way to subscribers. If you have a more complete copy of this publication, or any issues of the SG which might help us complete our collection, please contact us at conflictgypsy (at) gmail (dot) com

 

ALF SG Newsletter #17 .pdf link


http://www.conflictgypsy.com/2011/07/the-animal-liberation-front-supporters-group-newsletter-17/

“BoldNative” Animal Liberation Film. Most Excellent!!

 

“BoldNative” Animal Liberation Film. Most Excellent!!

Go here for more info: http://boldnative.com/

Posted 18 July 2011, by Staff, Animal Rights, winnipeganimals.blogspot.com

I loved it. It’s an excellent movie about Animal Liberation Front people. It’s funny and harrowing and interesting and entertaining all at once. And well filmed: beautiful shots of animals and bugs and just being free in the world, all spliced with real footage of caged animals (hard to witness, though I have seen it all before).

It’s got some great lines, such as, “They build the cages; we break them open.” It reiterates a non-violent approach over and over and over.

The main character is just great. Quiet and contemplative and committed.

The only beef (beef? say wha?) is there are these background news reports of arson against “farms” –and Catherine and I were all, “Our peeps don’t do that! If there’s a fire, the building is empty. It’s only “farmers” who let the buildings burn with animals in them.”

Oh, and another beef: lots of hippies.

Very enjoyable, though, so highly recommended. And the hippy stuff is balanced with the more reigned-in stuff, too.

One of the things I took away from it: what enclaves of cruelty universities are. Oh, I knew that before. But there is just not enough outside input on these goddamn castles of “research” and sadism. I’m sick of it. Then, they get mad when people ask, “What ARE you doing?? What the hell are you promoting intensive confinement for?” They get mad when universities are Supposed to be the Sites of Questioning.

Gah.

I think we will have to screen Bold Native on campus and have a Q and A session.

 

http://winnipeganimals.blogspot.com/2011/07/animal-liberation-film-most-excellent.html

Anonymous Hackers Group Declares Solidarity With Animal Liberation Struggle

 

Anonymous Hackers Group Declares Solidarity With Animal Liberation Struggle

 

Posted 21 July 2011, by Animal Liberation Press Office, San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center, indybay.org

 

Watch the Anonymous video communique here: http://www.indybay.org/js/flowplayer/FlowPlayer.swf

Watch the ALF video communique here: http://www.indybay.org/uploads/2011/07/21/we_are_anonymous_-animal_liberation_.mp4

Los Angeles: In a computer-generated spoken communique on YouTube last week, the hackers group Anonymous voiced its solidarity with the struggle for animal liberation. Citing the commonality of oppression against humans and non-human animals, the group highlighted the injustice in animal experimentation and the unnecessary consumption of animal flesh, and asked the public not to turn their backs on non-humans capable of “emotions such as joy. anger. sadness & fear. both [humans and non-human animals] have families. mothers. fathers. brothers. sisters. sons & daughters”.

The communique transcribed in full reads: Hello You Tube. We are anonymous. We are legion. It has come to our attention. that not only human rights are important. but animal rights as well. Both are being oppressed every single day. Both are being denied the right to live freely as we deserve to. Both have the capability to feel emotions such as joy. anger. sadness & fear. both have families. mothers. fathers. brothers. sisters. sons & daughters. both deserve to live free from harm. Animals are innocent beings & have done nothing what so ever to be sentenced to death. They are defenceless & it is our duty to defend them from harm. A human being can survive perfectly fine without eating meat. This has been practiced over centuries & proven by us. The need to experiment on animals is wrong. For there are many alternatives to experiment on without using the animal. This also has been proven by animal right activists & scientists. Please feel free to comment on your thoughts. We are open for discussion on this issue of animal rights. Please do not turn your back on this great injustice the animals are facing every single day. Animals are our friends. And we do not eat our friends. We are the voice of the voiceless. We do not forget. We do not forgive. Expect us.

The North American Animal Liberation Press Office unequivocally supports the actions of Anonymous, as a critical component in the fight against a capitalist state intent on the destruction of habitat, oppression of those who are necessary to sustain its domination, and suppression of any dissent by those who recognize the need to act against tyranny.

Contact:
Animal Liberation Press Office
3371 Glendale Blvd. #107
Los Angeles, CA 90039

PLF Press Release – Solidarity With ALF

 

PLF Press Release – Solidarity With ALF

 

Posted 21 July 2011, by A Guest, PasteBin, pastebin.com

July 21, 2011

It has come to the recent attention of the Peoples Liberation Front – Central Command that our dearest allies, Anonymous – have recently declared solidarity with the animal liberation movement in general, and the Animal Liberation Front in particular. We applaud our dear headless friend Anonymous for their righteous choice, and the Peoples Liberation Front would like to state to the world categorically that we join this unprecedented and historical coalition.

The fact is that from it’s inception, we have considered the Peoples Liberation Front and the Animal Liberation Front as a cousin if not sister organization. For decades both groups have shared a common activist ideal, and a progressive and relentless agenda of liberation.

Now the PLF is proud to join with Anonymous and form this powerful new coalition to protect and defend the wonderful creatures of this world. We look forward to planning and coordinating our various ground and cyber assets to effect future operations that will be effective in the over-arching goal of protecting the animals from harm.

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2011/07/21/18685568.php

SIGNED  –  PLF Central Command

———————–
Peoples Liberation Front

http://www.PeoplesLiberationFront.tk

 

http://pastebin.com/M4y4V5Ba

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 62 other followers